Past Review

By (Political Science and Government., Clark University) for

London School of Economics (LSE): London - General Course, Year-Long Study Abroad Programme

What did you gain/learn from your experience abroad? Was it worthwhile?
Yes. I have learned a lot about myself and about others through this program. It's very rare that one gets the opportunity to study with some of the best minds in the world. It's stressful, but in the end you can proudly declare that you once attended the LSE. Not many can say that.

Personal Information

How much international exposure did you have prior to this program? 0-2 weeks
The term and year this program took place: Fall 2009

Review Your Program

* Overall educational experience

Academic rigor, intensity, resources, etc.

The academics at the LSE are very strong. The professors are truly some of the brightest minds in the world. Also, the resources available to LSE students through class discussions, public lectures, and the library are unparalleled. That said, to be a student at the LSE is not an easy experience as it takes some serious diligence and self-motivation. For example, one of my history courses, HY 235, has over 500 recommended books on the reading list...the academics here can appear exceedingly difficult. However, it is still a rewarding experience. The professors at the LSE are not as accessible as most American professors as they attend conferences throughout Europe and care more about their own independent research. Also, the grading is more difficult than the American system...it's really difficult to get a first.

* Host Country Program Administration

On-site administration of your program

I never once had a problem, but I knew what resources were available to me at the LSE.

* Housing:

How satisfied were you with your living arrangements?

I lived in Intercollegiate Halls (Commonwealth Hall) which was 1 mile from LSE but very close to Brunswick (shopping center with supermarket Waitrose) and the University of London. I don't regret living here, though the rooms are very basic and the showers are not great (you have to continually hold a button to get hot water...once you let go it stops emitting water..arghh). It costs 20 pounds per day (this includes 2 meals a day). Felt very safe with CCTV cameras recording my every move.

* Food:

Food in London can be expensive so the dorm I lived in had a catering service...the food is nothing great and extremely basic. Though I think I saved a lot of money living in a catered hall in the long-run (meals amount to 2-3 pounds per day). At the LSE, at 12:30-1pm a man from Hare Krishna provides a free vegetarian meal for all the students. Something to consider when the bank account becomes empty.

* Social & Cultural Integration:

How integrated did you feel with the local culture?

London is a huge city with cultural events occurring every hour of the day. Though, I wish I had more time to explore London (LSE does not stand for Let's See Europe or London School of Entertainment).

* Health Care:

How well were health issues addressed during the program?

* Safety:

I always felt safe in London (though I am over 6 feet tall and a man). Also, NHS provides free healthcare to students on a visa...imagine that Americans. You get free, government-run, socialized medicine because people in the UK think this is the right thing to do. I sort of liked having this as a safety net. Boy will I miss the UK.

If you could do it all over again would you choose the same program? Yes

Finances

* Money: How easily were you able to live on a student's budget?

(1 = not very easy/$200+ on food & personal expenses/week, 2.5 = $100/week, 5 = very easily/minimal cost)

Direct Enrollment/Exchange

* Did you study abroad through an exchange program or did you directly enroll in the foreign university? Direct Enrollment

Other Program Information

* Where did you live?

Select all that apply

  • Dorm
* Who did you live with?

Select all that apply

  • Local Students
  • International Students

A Look Back

* What do you know now that you wish you knew before going on this program? Don't be afraid by the intense academics. Just apply and hope you get the chance in the lifetime to study at one of the world's finest institutions.

Individual Course Reviews

Course Name/Rating:

Strategic Aspects of International Relations

Course Department: IR 305/405
Instructor: Christopher Coker
Instruction Language: English
Comments: This was my favorite course at the LSE. There are only 15 lectures as this course covers issues such as: humanitarian war (should we even try to make war more humane?), the effects of globalization (especially when it comes to climate change politics, diseases, transnational organized crime), genocide (look at Bauman's thesis on Modernity and the Holocaust), terrorism, NATO, warfare in the developing world, theories of war from Clausewitz to Sun Tzu, etc. The class teacher for discussions, Alexis Cowell, is amazing and I prefer her weekly class talks more than Coker's lectures at times. Coker is a conservative British man that seriously loves to insult the french whenever he can (sorry but I'm French).
Credit Transfer Issues:
Course Name/Rating:

Modern East Asia

Course Department: HY 235
Instructor: Antony Best and Arne Westad
Instruction Language: English (Prof. Westad has a strong Norwegian accent)
Comments: This is probably my least favorite of my courses at the LSE. I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed the lectures by Antony Best when he covered topics regarding Japan. However, lectures on China and Korea taught by Westad were not as good. I think someone with a more passionate interest in China, Japan, and Korea from 1840 onwards would perhaps enjoy this class a bit more than I did. The readings were pretty dry most of the time and there were so many books on the required reading list that you feel like you are constantly drowning in work and not making any progress.
Credit Transfer Issues:
Course Name/Rating:

Introduction to Political Thought

Course Department: GV 100
Instructor: Janet Coleman and Prof. Kelly
Instruction Language: English
Comments: I actually really enjoyed this course and it made me wish I minored in philosophy. Janet Coleman is a great lecturer and a natural entertainer that struts the stage laughing at her own jokes. Her book that corresponds with Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Thomas Acquinas, St. Augustine, and Machiavelli is very helpful. The second half of the course taught by Prof. Kelly had better political philosophers such as Hobbes, Rousseau, Mill, Locke, Marx, and Rawls which are all (except for Rawls) easy and enjoyable to read. The course was overall a standard and solid overview of the political philosophers that have framed the debate on the purpose of government for the past 2,000 years. This course is very Western-specific however and one will not learn about Chinese or Islamic political thought.
Credit Transfer Issues:
Course Name/Rating:

Internationalisation of Economic Growth

Course Department: EH 101
Instructor: Tim Luenig and Albert
Instruction Language: English
Comments: This basic economic history course is the most popular and most highly recommended course from LSE students. The lectures from Tim Luenig are brilliant and it is very easy for folks with a poor economics background to understand the material. Take this course if you want to understand in more detail about why the gold standard fell apart in post WW1, why African nations lag behind in economic growth, why apartheid was bad economically in South Africa, why the East Asian Tigers were successful, Will China's growth continue, etc.
Credit Transfer Issues: